Industrial-base intelligence for space acquisition decisions.
HHI concentration, SAI factor tracking, supplier reliability — the data layer behind informed contracting.
1 · At a glance
58.1 / 100
SAI composite score
sai.json
13
Sectors with HHI data
space_sector_registry.json
9,450
Gov grants indexed
grants.json
101
Companies with live ARI
finance.json
SAI is the 17-factor Space Accessibility Index across 6 supply-chain tiers; ARI is the 11-factor company-level risk composite. Both are confidence-weighted so thinly-sourced inputs do not drag the score. See the published methodology for full derivation.
2 · Use cases for acquisition
Use case 1
Source selection
Operator reliability (S/PF/F split), cash runway, and ARI composite feed the risk assessment behind a source-selection decision memo. Confidence tags travel with every factor, so the past-performance rationale is fully auditable when an IG challenges the award.
Use case 2
Market research
HHI concentration per sector identifies supplier-diversity gaps — a natural input for FAR Part 10 market research, NDAA §889 analyses, and DFARS 252.225-7017 compliant sourcing. When a market is concentrating, HHI shows it one quarter before the program impact.
Use case 3
Small-business sourcing
SBIR / STTR grant history plus private-company ARI scoring surfaces credible Phase III candidates. We track $17M across 9 SBIR/STTR awards with phase breakdowns, so a CO scoping a small-business set-aside can see who has a track record before the RFP goes out.
Use case 4
Industrial-base monitoring
SAI factor trend tracking feeds DPA Title III reporting, DSTI-style industrial-base reviews, and defense industrial-base reports. 14 of 17 SAI factors are auto-computed on every pipeline run; each carries a reported, derived, or estimated confidence tag.
3 · Published methodology
Every calculation is public. Every source is public. No black-box scores. Weights are derived empirically from 2010–2025 historical data via R² regression and elasticity analysis; role multipliers are documented; the full audit trail (weights.json) is reproducible by government partners under NDA or SBIR Phase II arrangement. Published methodology is a gov-sales signal, not a marketing bullet — if you can’t show your work, you can’t defend the award.
Read the methodology whitepaper → · Data licensing posture →
4 · Data-rights posture
AstraVeris ingests only public-source data and self-classifies the product as EAR99 under the Export Administration Regulations. No ITAR-controlled inputs are used, stored, or processed. AstraVeris is U.S.-owned and U.S.-operated. For engagements that introduce CUI, we team with a CMMC Level 2 prime under their envelope rather than taking custody of controlled data on our own infrastructure — teaming is a deliberate architectural choice that keeps the analytics shareable across allied-partner and commercial underwriting contexts without export-license friction.
Full ITAR / EAR99 posture →
5 · Registration status
Transparency on paperwork. Registrations are in progress; this section is updated as each completes.
Federal registration
-
SAM.gov UEI
Not yet registered — registration in progress
-
CAGE code
Not yet registered — pending UEI
-
NAICS codes
541715 · 541511 · 541512 · 541990 · 511210
-
SBC certified
Not yet registered — registration in progress
-
DSIP registered
Not yet registered — pending SBC cert
Next step
Request a capability-statement PDF.
One clean page, NAICS codes, points of contact, and the data surfaces relevant to your program office. We reply within one business day. If your office prefers a briefing to a PDF, the same email gets you on the calendar — a 30-minute walkthrough, no deck, aimed at the specific problem statement you’re scoping.
Email [email protected] →